How the Correct Venue is Chosen for a Civil Lawsuit

One responsibility of an experienced personal injury attorney is to work towards helping his client receive as much compensation for an injury as they deserve.

They want to ensure that any damages you have incurred as a result of an accident will be paid and that your future will also not be hindered by the other party’s negligence. There are a variety of things an attorney needs to consider before filing a claim on your behalf. The attorney will consider who is ultimately responsible for the injury, which possible defendant will have sufficient insurance coverage to pay for all of your damages, and where to file your claim.

How State Laws Affect Choosing a Venue – Correct Venue in Texas

Different states have different laws and guidelines regarding civil suits. A Houston personal injury attorney will be well aware, not just of Texas law, but also the laws in surrounding states. For example, in Kansas, there is a $250,000 cap on the non-economic damages a defendant may receive as a result of civil lawsuit. Also, their partial liability laws differ from those in Texas. A defendant may not recover any damages in a suit if a jury finds them to be more than 50% liable for the accident. If at all possible, it may be in the best interest of a client to have their case filed in a Texas court.

personal injury attorney may have some options when choosing where to file a claim. By law, they are permitted to file in the county where the defendant resides or has their business. They could also choose to file in the county where the accident occurred.

The Economic Impact of a Change in Venue

In a situation where there are differences in state, the court will decide which one has the most significant relationship with the claim. When a Texas woman was injured in a warehouse in Kansas, an analysis of the case allowed for it to be moved to Texas once it was determined that both parties involved were Texas residents. Once a change in venue had been accepted the defendants, realizing the potential of a larger jury award, began to increase the amount of their offers, but fell short of the million dollars the plaintiff was seeking. After hearing evidence from both sides, the jury returned a $1.5 million verdict with a 25% fault attributed to the plaintiff.

The total cost of medical care in this case was $409,000. If you add to that the $250,000 non-economic limit that Kansas law would have imposed, and then taken away the 25% liability, the injured party in this case would have received $494,250 had it been tried in the state where the injury occurred. The decision of the attorney to change venue allowed the plaintiff an additional $675,750 in compensation.

Maximizing Your Compensation – Choose Correct Venue In Texas

There are many ways for a savvy Texas personal injury attorney to maximize your compensation. If you have recently suffered injury at the hands of another party’s negligence, discuss the details with RJ Alexander Law, PLLC at (832) 458-1756. Helping you recover any and all damages will be our first priority.


Lawsuit Resources

Accident Reconstruction
Chose Correct Venue
Contingency Fee Arrangement
Defense Appeals to Jury Verdict
Documenting a Car Accident
Expert Testimony
Importance of Credibility
Obtaining a Police Report

Obtaining Medical Records
Police Report
Protect Your Financial Interest
Protect Your Rights
Proving Alcohol Intoxication
Role of a Jury
Stranded on the Highway
Sympathetic Plaintiff
Traffic Control Devices